http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/05/12/how-bad-can-google-blog-search-possibly-be/ What I'm doing when I'm not doing anything else... Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:00:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/05/12/how-bad-can-google-blog-search-possibly-be/comment-page-1/#comment-16 Keith Tue, 15 May 2007 20:52:23 +0000 http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/05/12/how-bad-can-google-blog-search-possibly-be/#comment-16 I've seen that article, which is why I'm so confused. If they really do use Google Reader subscription data to rank results, does that mean that there are a significant number of blog search spammers subscribing to their own bogus feeds? I’ve seen that article, which is why I’m so confused. If they really do use Google Reader subscription data to rank results, does that mean that there are a significant number of blog search spammers subscribing to their own bogus feeds?

]]> http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/05/12/how-bad-can-google-blog-search-possibly-be/comment-page-1/#comment-13 Raoul Sat, 12 May 2007 12:41:54 +0000 http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/05/12/how-bad-can-google-blog-search-possibly-be/#comment-13 Hey Keith, you might want to read <a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/04/18/how-google-blogsearch-ranks-your-posts-in-their-own-words/" rel="nofollow">this blog post</a>. Someone's looked at Google Blog Search's filed patent and summarized how they rank blogs. The thing is, according to that, splogs should not rank highly in search results, but the fact of the matter is that they do. Hey Keith, you might want to read this blog post. Someone’s looked at Google Blog Search’s filed patent and summarized how they rank blogs. The thing is, according to that, splogs should not rank highly in search results, but the fact of the matter is that they do.

]]>