Round-up of coverage related to 3701

A brief round-up of coverage and commentary related to my recent post on 3701 N. Fairfax Dr.:

I’ll update this list as I get wind of any further coverage.

Share This
This entry was posted in Meta, Photography and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Round-up of coverage related to 3701

  1. Raoul says:

    Alright! Glad to see it make the rounds! :-)

  2. Pingback: KWM » Do not photograph 3701 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA

  3. Jan says:

    Hi here’s a resource and also an “event repository” complete with “forbidden photos” and dialogue.
    Some resources for dealing with photographic harassment are at this link
    http://www.flickr.com/groups/leavemealone/discuss/72157600112017365/

  4. b shaw says:

    Could you clarify something? Was Malara working as a rent-a-cop at the time? If so, he appeared to be in uniform in your photograph on your site. Did he wear that uniform when he spoke with you? (If so, I can understand everyone’s confusion.) Also, have you pursued this with the private security firm? If not, why not? Apparently, Malara was representing the private security company working for occupants at the building. Also, I would be interested in the jurisdiction of off duty cops, while working as rent-a-cops. Do you have any understanding of this?

    b shaw

  5. Pingback: KWM » Stop and identify law in the D.C. metro area

  6. Keith says:

    @b shaw: Officer Malara was both 1) wearing his county police uniform and 2) working a private detail commissioned by the occupants of 3701.

    And, as I understand it, an officer’s law enforcement powers have more to do with uniform and oath, and less to do with source(s) of funding. A police officer, once he identifies himself as such, should be treated with due respect. Thus, the (rather serious) illegality of impersonating a member of law enforcement.