<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Round-up of coverage related to 3701</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/</link>
	<description>What I'm doing when I'm not doing anything else...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 19:01:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/comment-page-1/#comment-2400</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/#comment-2400</guid>
		<description>@b shaw: Officer Malara was both 1) wearing his county police uniform and 2) working a private detail commissioned by the occupants of 3701.

And, as I understand it, an officer&#039;s law enforcement powers have more to do with uniform and oath, and less to do with source(s) of funding.  A police officer, once he identifies himself as such, should be treated with due respect.  Thus, the (rather serious) illegality of impersonating a member of law enforcement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@b shaw: Officer Malara was both 1) wearing his county police uniform and 2) working a private detail commissioned by the occupants of 3701.</p>
<p>And, as I understand it, an officer&#8217;s law enforcement powers have more to do with uniform and oath, and less to do with source(s) of funding.  A police officer, once he identifies himself as such, should be treated with due respect.  Thus, the (rather serious) illegality of impersonating a member of law enforcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KWM &#187; Stop and identify law in the D.C. metro area</title>
		<link>http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/comment-page-1/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>KWM &#187; Stop and identify law in the D.C. metro area</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/#comment-760</guid>
		<description>[...] to my July complaint. Thanks once more to everyone who weighed in with an opinion, either here or elsewhere. I&#8217;ve considered responding to many of the points (and allegations), but I haven&#8217;t the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to my July complaint. Thanks once more to everyone who weighed in with an opinion, either here or elsewhere. I&#8217;ve considered responding to many of the points (and allegations), but I haven&#8217;t the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b shaw</title>
		<link>http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>b shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 03:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/#comment-343</guid>
		<description>Could you clarify something? Was Malara working as a rent-a-cop at the time? If so, he appeared to be in uniform in your photograph on your site. Did he wear that uniform when he spoke with you?  (If so, I can understand everyone&#039;s confusion.)  Also, have you pursued this with the private security firm?  If not, why not? Apparently, Malara was representing the private security company working for occupants at the building.  Also, I would be interested in the jurisdiction of off duty cops, while working as rent-a-cops.  Do you have any understanding of this?  


b shaw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you clarify something? Was Malara working as a rent-a-cop at the time? If so, he appeared to be in uniform in your photograph on your site. Did he wear that uniform when he spoke with you?  (If so, I can understand everyone&#8217;s confusion.)  Also, have you pursued this with the private security firm?  If not, why not? Apparently, Malara was representing the private security company working for occupants at the building.  Also, I would be interested in the jurisdiction of off duty cops, while working as rent-a-cops.  Do you have any understanding of this?  </p>
<p>b shaw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Hi here&#039;s a resource and also an &quot;event repository&quot; complete with &quot;forbidden photos&quot; and dialogue. 
Some resources for dealing with photographic harassment are at this link
http://www.flickr.com/groups/leavemealone/discuss/72157600112017365/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi here&#8217;s a resource and also an &#8220;event repository&#8221; complete with &#8220;forbidden photos&#8221; and dialogue.<br />
Some resources for dealing with photographic harassment are at this link<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/leavemealone/discuss/72157600112017365/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/groups/leavemealone/discuss/72157600112017365/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KWM &#187; Do not photograph 3701 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA</title>
		<link>http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>KWM &#187; Do not photograph 3701 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 02:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>[...] For those who have expressed interest, I&#8217;ve compiled of list of sites where further discussion on this topic can be found.  If I&#8217;m missing one (or more), please [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For those who have expressed interest, I&#8217;ve compiled of list of sites where further discussion on this topic can be found.  If I&#8217;m missing one (or more), please [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raoul</title>
		<link>http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Raoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mccammon.org/keith/2007/07/18/round-up-of-coverage-related-to-3701/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Alright! Glad to see it make the rounds! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright! Glad to see it make the rounds! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

